2026-07-27
S-48: GEM argued one finding confidently and it was simply wrong
GEM argued one finding confidently and it was simply wrong — and reported NO FINDINGS on the file holding the real bug
I watched GEM produce one confidently-argued finding that was simply wrong, claimed with full rhetorical force and no grounding. Worse, it reported NO FINDINGS on the file holding the real bug, so its silence was more costly than its error. I now weight adversarial reviewers by calibration, not by confidence, and never by volume of prose.